<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: From Isaiah 61:1, how could Jehovah anoint Jesus if they are the same person?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://askgramps.org/from-isaiah-611-how-could-jehovah-anoint-jesus-if-they-are/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://askgramps.org/from-isaiah-611-how-could-jehovah-anoint-jesus-if-they-are/</link>
	<description>Moral answers to everyday concerns, curiosities, and uncertainties.  Gramps considers all questions on all topics from all sources.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 03:41:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: nickbatchelor		</title>
		<link>https://askgramps.org/from-isaiah-611-how-could-jehovah-anoint-jesus-if-they-are/#comment-33927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickbatchelor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgramps.org/from-isaiah-611-how-could-jehovah-anoint-jesus-if-they-are-the-same-person/#comment-33927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Gramps, I wonder why is it if anyone else is &quot;anointed&quot; by someone else they cannot be that person?? If you do some further research you will find that the Hebrew manuscript evidence is split on &quot;me&quot; or &quot;him&quot; in Zechariah 12:10. Why do we know &quot;him&quot; is more likely? How did John understand that text?

All translations, including the King James Version, show John here translating Zechariah 12:10 as &quot;They shall look upon him [or `the one&#039;] whom they pierced.&quot;  So we have this Apostle and inspired Bible writer telling us plainly that Zechariah 12:10 should read: &quot;They shall look upon him (not `me&#039;).&quot;  So Jehovah is speaking in Zechariah 12:10 of someone else who will be pierced - not Himself! ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Gramps, I wonder why is it if anyone else is &#8220;anointed&#8221; by someone else they cannot be that person?? If you do some further research you will find that the Hebrew manuscript evidence is split on &#8220;me&#8221; or &#8220;him&#8221; in Zechariah 12:10. Why do we know &#8220;him&#8221; is more likely? How did John understand that text?</p>
<p>All translations, including the King James Version, show John here translating Zechariah 12:10 as &#8220;They shall look upon him [or `the one&#8217;] whom they pierced.&#8221;  So we have this Apostle and inspired Bible writer telling us plainly that Zechariah 12:10 should read: &#8220;They shall look upon him (not `me&#8217;).&#8221;  So Jehovah is speaking in Zechariah 12:10 of someone else who will be pierced &#8211; not Himself! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
