<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Here are scientific conclusions that no archeological evidence has been found in support of the Book of Mormon.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://askgramps.org/here-are-scientific-conclusions-that-no-archeological/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://askgramps.org/here-are-scientific-conclusions-that-no-archeological/</link>
	<description>Moral answers to everyday concerns, curiosities, and uncertainties.  Gramps considers all questions on all topics from all sources.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 03:40:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Wax		</title>
		<link>https://askgramps.org/here-are-scientific-conclusions-that-no-archeological/#comment-34024</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgramps.org/here-are-scientific-conclusions-that-no-archeological/#comment-34024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Awesome response Gramps!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome response Gramps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
