Comments on: Why do temple recommend questions not address following court orders?

By: LH Smith

LH Smith — Sat, 07 Jun 2014 22:35:00 +0000

In reply to katamb. Yes.. and the are you honest with your fellow man in all of your dealings also.. both of these seem to cover this area.

By: katamb

katamb — Fri, 06 Jun 2014 16:18:00 +0000

But there is a question close to this about fulfilling your family obligations, isn’t there? I can’t remember it exactly but know I’ve been asked it the past few times.

By: Jaimie

Jaimie — Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:44:00 +0000

I agree that it’s not reasonable to expect that the interview can cover every situation and that the goal is not to keep people out. But I do think that people who are not following court orders, if they are really being honest with themselves and others, could not say that they are honest in their dealings with their fellow man. So in this way, it does kind of cover it, just not in a ‘micromanaging’ way, like Gramps said. It’s really up to the person being interviewed to be honest. Because in the end they are the one who will have to answer for their dealings and their own honesty or dishonesty.