<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Was Shem, son of Noah, the same person as Melchizedek?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://askgramps.org/was-shem-son-of-noah-the-same-person-as-melchizedek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://askgramps.org/was-shem-son-of-noah-the-same-person-as-melchizedek/</link>
	<description>Moral answers to everyday concerns, curiosities, and uncertainties.  Gramps considers all questions on all topics from all sources.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 03:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jonathan Felt		</title>
		<link>https://askgramps.org/was-shem-son-of-noah-the-same-person-as-melchizedek/#comment-31844</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Felt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgramps.org/was-shem-son-of-noah-the-same-person-as-melchizedek/#comment-31844</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In Brooklyn recently my Jewish hosts told me of their belief about Shem being Melchizedek.  I suppose their belief (the Jewish tradition) is to what Elder McConkie was referring.  I can&#039;t see why Shem couldn&#039;t be Melchizedek based only on the plural word &quot;fathers&quot; since it can have dual meaning.  Am I missing something obvious?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Brooklyn recently my Jewish hosts told me of their belief about Shem being Melchizedek.  I suppose their belief (the Jewish tradition) is to what Elder McConkie was referring.  I can&#8217;t see why Shem couldn&#8217;t be Melchizedek based only on the plural word &#8220;fathers&#8221; since it can have dual meaning.  Am I missing something obvious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
