<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Was the Book of Abraham correctly translated?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://askgramps.org/what-of-the-papyrus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://askgramps.org/what-of-the-papyrus/</link>
	<description>Moral answers to everyday concerns, curiosities, and uncertainties.  Gramps considers all questions on all topics from all sources.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 22:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SRR		</title>
		<link>https://askgramps.org/what-of-the-papyrus/#comment-34925</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SRR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2016 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgramps.org/what-of-the-papyrus/#comment-34925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a subject that I just started researching.  I was going to ask a question about it, but I used the search function and found it had already been addressed.  
I stay away from anti Mormon sites because I know they are simply hell bent on proving something is false.  At the same time I don&#039;t want to rely on only Church resources, because they are slanted in just the opposite direction.  I want to go to the source materials and then decide for myself.  Our religion is based on gaining knowledge.  I don&#039;t believe suggesting that the subject matter is trival, is a path to gaining knowledge.  I find it odd that all of the source materials used by Joseph Smith are missing.  I remember when the fragments were discovered and I believed they would confirm my beliefs.  But the fragments found certainly do not confirm the Book of Abraham.  And it is not a trival matter.  It seems that such an important document about the life of Abraham would have been preserved?  I find it odd that it wasn&#039;t protected and guarded.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a subject that I just started researching.  I was going to ask a question about it, but I used the search function and found it had already been addressed.<br />
I stay away from anti Mormon sites because I know they are simply hell bent on proving something is false.  At the same time I don&#8217;t want to rely on only Church resources, because they are slanted in just the opposite direction.  I want to go to the source materials and then decide for myself.  Our religion is based on gaining knowledge.  I don&#8217;t believe suggesting that the subject matter is trival, is a path to gaining knowledge.  I find it odd that all of the source materials used by Joseph Smith are missing.  I remember when the fragments were discovered and I believed they would confirm my beliefs.  But the fragments found certainly do not confirm the Book of Abraham.  And it is not a trival matter.  It seems that such an important document about the life of Abraham would have been preserved?  I find it odd that it wasn&#8217;t protected and guarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
