<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why isn&#8217;t the Mormon Church holding my ex-husband accountable for his recreant actions?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://askgramps.org/why-isnt-the-mormon-church-holding-my-ex-husband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://askgramps.org/why-isnt-the-mormon-church-holding-my-ex-husband/</link>
	<description>Moral answers to everyday concerns, curiosities, and uncertainties.  Gramps considers all questions on all topics from all sources.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 03:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Douglas Self		</title>
		<link>https://askgramps.org/why-isnt-the-mormon-church-holding-my-ex-husband/#comment-35756</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Self]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgramps.org/why-isnt-the-mormon-church-holding-my-ex-husband/#comment-35756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This sister&#039;s focus should be on obtaining, if possible, appropriate child and spousal support from this pathetic excuse of a man.  If he&#039;s cut himself off from the Church voluntarily, as Gramps has pointed out, he&#039;s already accomplished being &#039;cut off&#039;, and NOT in a way that ANY Church disciplinary council would intend, wherein, even if the appropriate outcome is excommunication, it&#039;s with the idea that this fellow is in need of repentance and having his membership and covenants taken away is the best means to accomplished that end...what it&#039;s NEVER for is to satisfy his aggrieved ex-wife&#039;s understandable anger and hurt over being abandoned.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sister&#8217;s focus should be on obtaining, if possible, appropriate child and spousal support from this pathetic excuse of a man.  If he&#8217;s cut himself off from the Church voluntarily, as Gramps has pointed out, he&#8217;s already accomplished being &#8216;cut off&#8217;, and NOT in a way that ANY Church disciplinary council would intend, wherein, even if the appropriate outcome is excommunication, it&#8217;s with the idea that this fellow is in need of repentance and having his membership and covenants taken away is the best means to accomplished that end&#8230;what it&#8217;s NEVER for is to satisfy his aggrieved ex-wife&#8217;s understandable anger and hurt over being abandoned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
