Print Friendly, PDF & Email




In these days we often see the increasing corruption of government, the infringement of rights and a disregard of the constitution by our country’s leaders. Many of our God-given liberties and freedoms are being threatened, including our freedom to worship freely.  Assuming things continue to worsen, at what point are we going to be odds with the 12th Article of Faith? We believe in being subject to presidents and obeying, honoring and sustaining the law. What if that law works against our religious freedom or forces us to sustain an immoral practice. Are there any circumstances where the Church would stand against Federal or state law when it comes to our freedom and morality?





Dear Matthew,

That is a big, long, tough question. I think I should begin answering with the Book of Mormon. It cannot be overstated that the Book of Mormon was written with us in mind. President Hinckley was spot on when he said,
  “The Book of Mormon narrative is a chronicle of nations long since gone. But in its descriptions of the problems of today’s society, it is as current as the morning newspaper and much more definitive, inspired, and inspiring concerning the solutions of those problems.”
Moroni said that he had been shown our day by Jesus. Having that kind of vision of what would come surely guided the editorial and abridgment processes.


With that as a backdrop, the most dire warning to us from the Book of Mormon is about secret combinations. Multiple times we are told that these were the cause of the downfall of an entire civilization, and we now are seeing works of darkness being exposed on a regular basis. This corruption leads to unjust laws and puts us in a situation of having to decide to obey these or not.


The Twelfth Article of Faith, along with other passages of scripture serve as wonderful guides in what we should do as a church and as members. The Church has not always come down on the side of the article as you paraphrased it. Take for example, illegal immigration. Recently the First Presidency said the following:
“The First Presidency has for many years taught that undocumented status should not by itself prevent an otherwise worthy Church member from entering the temple or being ordained to the priesthood.”
It is important to not misquote the article by adding in a coordinating conjunction that is not there. The Article reads,
“We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying honoring, and sustaining the law.”
There is no ‘and’ after magistrates. The correct grammar suggests that we are to sustain the these governors IN their obeying, honoring and sustaining the law. That is an important distinction.


President Joseph F. Smith said,
It seems to me that [D&C 98:4–7, 10–11] makes this matter so clear that it is not possible for any man who professes to be a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to make any mistake, or to be in doubt as to the course he should pursue under the command of God in relation to the observance of the laws of the land. [God] will hold [lawmakers] responsible if they will pass unconstitutional measures and frame unjust and proscriptive laws. . . If lawmakers have a mind to violate their oath, break their covenants and their faith with the people, and depart from the provisions of the constitution, where is the law, human or divine, which binds me, as an individual, to outwardly and openly proclaim my acceptance of their acts?(Gospel Doctrine Sermons & Writings of Joseph F. Smith. New York: Deseret Books, 1999. Print.).
John Taylor added,
Taking this nation as an example, all laws that are proper and correct, and all obligations entered into which are not violative of the Constitution should be kept inviolate. But if they are violative of the Constitution, then the compact between the rulers and the ruled is broken and the obligation ceases to be binding. Just as a person agreeing to purchase anything and to pay a certain amount for it, if he receives the article bargained for, and does not pay its price, he violates his contract; but if he does not receive the article he is not required to pay for it (Taylor, John. Journal of Discourse. Vol. 26. 1884: 350. Print.).
Finally, Ezra Taft Benson said,
In it is a declaration requiring obedience, loyalty to, and respect for duly constituted laws and the officials administering those laws. In justifying such loyal compliance, however, the Lord also promulgated certain safeguards and conditions which must be observed if freedom and liberty are to be preserved and enjoyed. These are emphasized in primarily in the 98th and 134th sections of the Doctrine and Covenants (Benson, Ezra Taft. God, Family, Country: Our Three Great Loyalties. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1974. Print. Pg. 277).
I suggest you read the sections that President Benson mentions in his quote. There have been times, even recently, when a broken state law has not been considered a violation to God’s law as with immigration. I am sure there will be times in the future when we will feel an obligation to peacefully protest some legislation, even to the point of non-compliance. It will be incumbent upon us to do all we can to correct governments who have violated the trust and protection of the governed. There is latter-day doctrine and ancient scripture that will serve as a guide for us as these issues come up from time to time. 






Copyright © 2022 Ask Gramps - Q and A about Mormon Doctrine. All Rights Reserved.
This website is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. For the official Church websites, please visit or

Pin It on Pinterest