Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Question

 

Gramps,

I heard from a seminary teacher that the stories in the Old Testament aren’t true; they are parables to teach a principle. I have always believed they were all true.

Robyn

 

Answer

 

Robyn,

Biblical literalism is the belief that the Bible should be interpreted as a factual account of historical events. This perspective has been a point of contention among scholars and theologians, particularly within The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In 2008, the Church clarified that Latter-day Saints do not strictly adhere to biblical literalism, allowing for a more nuanced interpretation of scripture. This means that while some passages may be read as literal truth, others can be understood metaphorically or allegorically, depending on their context and purpose.

For instance, the story of Jonah and the whale is often cited as a narrative that conveys profound truths about repentance and redemption, regardless of whether Jonah existed or was swallowed by a fish. The moral lessons embedded in such stories are considered more significant than their historical accuracy. This approach encourages members to engage with the scriptures on a deeper level, seeking the principles that can guide their lives rather than fixating solely on the factuality of events.

Allegory plays a crucial role in biblical literature, allowing for complex ideas to be communicated through narrative. Many stories in the Bible, including those of Adam and Eve and Noah’s Ark, can be interpreted as allegorical representations of broader truths about human nature, divine love, and the consequences of sin. For example, the creation story in Genesis is not merely a scientific account of how the world was formed; it serves to illustrate the relationship between God and humanity, emphasizing themes of agency, responsibility, and the divine plan.

The Church encourages its members to explore these allegorical meanings, recognizing that the scriptures are not a single genre but a compilation of various literary forms, including poetry, law codes, and parables. This understanding allows for a richer engagement with the text, as readers can appreciate the diverse ways in which truth is conveyed.

The story of Noah’s Ark is one of the most well-known narratives in the Bible, often viewed as a literal account of a global flood. However, modern scientific reasoning challenges the feasibility of such an event, leading many to question its historicity. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints traditionally teaches that the flood was a literal event, but there is also room for interpretation that considers it as a localized or allegorical occurrence.

Early Church leaders, including Brigham Young, expressed beliefs in the literal nature of the flood, yet contemporary discussions within the Church have shifted towards a focus on the lessons learned from the story rather than the mechanics of how it occurred. This reflects a broader trend among Latter-day Saints to reconcile faith with scientific understanding, allowing for a more flexible interpretation of scripture.

Regardless of its literal truth, the story of Noah’s Ark conveys essential lessons about obedience, faith, and the consequences of sin. The narrative serves as a reminder of the importance of righteousness and the potential for redemption, themes that resonate deeply within the teachings of the Church. By focusing on these moral lessons, members can derive meaning from the story without becoming entangled in debates over its historical accuracy.

Moreover, the Church’s emphasis on personal revelation encourages individuals to seek their understanding of scripture, allowing for diverse interpretations that can coexist within the faith community. This approach fosters a culture of inquiry and reflection, where members are invited to explore the scriptures’ meanings in their lives.

The creation story of Adam and Eve is another narrative that invites both literal and allegorical interpretations. While some may view the account as a factual description of humanity’s origins, others see it as a symbolic representation of the human experience. The idea that Adam was formed from the dust of the earth and Eve from his rib can be understood as metaphors for the interconnectedness of humanity and the divine.

This allegorical reading aligns with the Church’s teachings that the accounts of creation are not meant to provide a scientific explanation but rather to convey spiritual truths about God’s relationship with His creations. The emphasis on agency, the fall, and the potential for redemption are central themes that resonate throughout the narrative, offering insights into the human condition and the divine plan [9].

Understanding the cultural and historical context of the creation story is essential for interpreting its meaning. Ancient Near Eastern literature often employed similar creation myths, suggesting that the biblical account was shaped by its cultural milieu. Recognizing these influences can enhance our understanding of the text and its intended messages, allowing readers to appreciate the richness of the narrative beyond its literal interpretation.

 

Gramps

 

 

 

Copyright © 2025 Ask Gramps - Q and A about Mormon Doctrine. All Rights Reserved.
This website is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. For the official Church websites, please visit churchofjesuschrist.org or comeuntochrist.org.

Pin It on Pinterest