Question
Gramps,
Is there anything in church doctrine about whether polygamy will exist in the Celestial Kingdom? I have heard this, but wanted to know if it is church doctrine.
Charlene
Answer
Charlene,
This is one of those topics that tends to pop up in quiet conversations, late-night questions, or even just a passing comment in a Sunday School class: Will polygamy exist in the Celestial Kingdom? And more importantly, is that actually official doctrine in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints—or just something people have speculated about over time?
Let’s take a breath and sort through it together, because there’s a lot of history, a little bit of doctrine, and a fair amount of misunderstanding wrapped up in this question.
Let’s start with the scriptural foundation. Section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenants is the primary source for discussing plural marriage. It presents eternal marriage as essential to exaltation and includes plural marriage as part of a commandment given at a specific time and in a specific context by Joseph Smith.
But here’s the key: even though plural marriage appears in that revelation, the Church today does not teach that it is required for exaltation.
That idea is reinforced in modern teaching. For example, the Church’s official instruction manual, Gospel Topics, states plainly:
“The standard doctrine of the Church is monogamy… Plural marriage was practiced only for a period of time under commandment from God.” (“Plural Marriage in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,” Gospel Topics Essay)
That alone already corrects a common misconception—that polygamy is somehow a standing or ongoing requirement. It’s not.
Now, where things get more complicated—and where your question really lives—is in the idea of eternity.
Some people point to the fact that a man can be sealed to more than one woman (for example, after the death of a spouse) and assume that means plural marriage must continue in the Celestial Kingdom. But Church leaders have been careful not to draw that conclusion.
In fact, Dallin H. Oaks addressed this very issue in a general conference talk. Speaking about complex sealing situations, he said:
“There is so much we do not know that our only sure reliance is to trust in the Lord and His love for His children.” (Trust in the Lord, Oct. 2019)
That’s a pretty direct acknowledgment: we don’t have all the details. And just as important, we’re not expected to figure them out on our own.
Elder Oaks has also spoken more personally about this. Because he himself is sealed to two wives (his first wife passed away), he’s had real-life reason to wrestle with the question. And his consistent message has been one of trust rather than speculation.
Similarly, Russell M. Nelson has emphasized focusing on covenants rather than trying to map out eternity. In one of his teachings on eternal marriage, he said:
“The ultimate objective of all we teach is to unite parents and children in faith in the Lord Jesus Christ… so that families can be sealed together eternally.” (Paraphrasing)
Notice what’s not there—there’s no emphasis on plural structure, only on eternal unity.
If we go back a bit further, earlier Church leaders sometimes spoke more openly about plural marriage as an eternal principle. But even then, there wasn’t a fully defined explanation of how it would function in the next life. And over time, the Church has moved away from speculation and toward a simpler, clearer focus: covenants, faithfulness, and trust in God.
President Gordon B. Hinckley made a very strong statement clarifying the Church’s position in modern times:
“I wish to state categorically that this Church has nothing whatever to do with those practicing polygamy… If any of our members are found to be practicing plural marriage, they are excommunicated.”
(Mormons and Polygamy)
Now, that quote is about current practice, not eternity—but it reinforces something important: plural marriage is not part of the Church’s present doctrine or expectation for members.
So when people jump from “it existed” to “it must exist forever,” they’re filling in a gap that Church leaders themselves have intentionally left open.
And that brings us to what may be the most reassuring thread running through all of this.
Again and again, leaders emphasize who God is rather than exactly how everything will be arranged.
Elder Oaks’ statement that “all things will be made right” isn’t just a throwaway line—it’s actually the doctrinal anchor for questions like this.
Because if we’re being honest, the concern behind the question isn’t usually just theological—it’s personal. People wonder: Will eternity feel fair? Will it feel whole? Will it feel like something I actually want?
And the consistent answer from Church leaders is: trust God.
Not blindly, but based on His revealed character—just, loving, perfectly aware of each person.
So, where does all of this land go?
If you’re looking for an official Church statement that says, “Yes, polygamy will exist in the Celestial Kingdom,” it simply doesn’t exist.
What does exist is:
- Scripture that includes plural marriage as a past commandment
- Modern prophetic teaching that monogamy is the standard today
- Clear statements that we do not fully understand how eternal relationships will be organized
- Repeated reassurance that God will make everything right
So if someone confidently claims that polygamy is guaranteed in eternity, they’re stepping beyond what has actually been revealed.
A more accurate, grounded answer would be: The Church does not have an official doctrine stating that polygamy will exist in the Celestial Kingdom. The details of eternal relationships have not been fully revealed, and we trust God to organize them in a way that is perfectly just and loving.
And honestly, that leaves room for something better than speculation—it leaves room for faith.
Gramps




